Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio River Restoration results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.7% saturation with 959 hits . Analysis detected 4,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,555 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of 96% (731 of 16,562 topics). This Ohio River Restoration is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Ohio River Restoration
Topic details
Total words: 1,555
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.6% percentile 13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 61.7% 61.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.5% 31.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 29.3% 29.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 34.7% 34.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 61.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 34.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst