Topic summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oem Practices results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 428 hits . Analysis detected 2,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,684 of 16,562 topics). This Oem Practices is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Oem Practices
Topic details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 31.6% 31.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 31.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst