Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Occupational Hazards results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 2,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,124 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,946 of 16,562 topics). This Occupational Hazards is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Occupational Hazards
Topic details
Total words: 3,124
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos