Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Teachers results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 2,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,387 of 16,562 topics). This Oakland Teachers is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Oakland Teachers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos