Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Schools results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,351 hits. Analysis detected 6,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,558 of 16,562 topics). This Oakland Schools is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Oakland Schools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos