Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos1,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Events results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 2,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,230 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,826 of 16,562 topics). This Oakland Events is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Oakland Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,230
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos