Topic summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Coliseum Sale results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,101 hits . Analysis detected 2,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,755 of 16,562 topics). This Oakland Coliseum Sale is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Oakland Coliseum Sale
Topic details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 29.3% 29.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst