Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Oakland Business Closures results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 2,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,063 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Oakland Business Closures is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oakland Business Closures
Topic details
Total words: 3,063
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos