Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Trash Management results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,160 of 16,562 topics). This Nyc Trash Management is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Nyc Trash Management
Topic details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos