Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nyc Subway results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Nyc Subway is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nyc Subway
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos