Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Health Department results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 1,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,550 of 16,562 topics). This Nyc Health Department is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Nyc Health Department
Topic details
Total words: 2,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 24.4%24.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos