Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Events results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 1,086 hits. Analysis detected 4,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,869 of 15,612 topics). This Nyc Events is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Nyc Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.0%28.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.6%17.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos