Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hank Shteamer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 1,086 hits . Analysis detected 4,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,894 of 6,628 authors). This Hank Shteamer is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Hank Shteamer
Author details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.0% 28.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.6% 17.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst