Topic summary
54% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Fusion results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,287 hits . Analysis detected 6,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,589 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,848 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Fusion is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Nuclear Fusion
Topic details
Total words: 6,589
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst