Topic summary
54%4 analyzed articles/videos1,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Fusion results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 6,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,589 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,848 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Fusion is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Nuclear Fusion
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate