Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Disarmament results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,710 of 15,471 topics). This Nuclear Disarmament is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Nuclear Disarmament
Topic details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
6.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.2%23.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos