Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ntsb results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 2,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,743 of 16,562 topics). This Ntsb is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Ntsb
Topic details
Total words: 1,167
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 29.3% 29.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 35.1% 35.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 20.6% 20.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 15.0% 15.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst