Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North St Louis results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,114 hits. Analysis detected 8,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,520 of 16,562 topics). This North St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
North St Louis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos