Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofits results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 6,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,558 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,524 of 15,447 topics). This Nonprofits is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Nonprofits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,558
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos