Topic summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Initiatives results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 4,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,926 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,460 of 16,558 topics). This Nonprofit Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Nonprofit Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 4,926
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos