Gothamist76%

Brownsville civilians handle crises in a model Mayor Mamdani may expand 57%

By Ben Feuerherd0%

5/12/2026, 10:31:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 1,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 852 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,287 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the article peer group.

Bilal Jacks was hanging out on a Brownsville sidewalk last month when he heard a man shouting down the block. 
“Excuse me for a second,” Jacks said. 
He headed to the source of the commotion: An argument between a man and a woman had broken out on the sidewalk in front of a deli on Mother Gaston Boulevard. 
He quickly worked to calm the situation down, and within a minute or so, the shouting stopped. 
Jacks is a lifelong Brownsville resident who works with a nonprofit called We Build The Block, and is also a participant in the Brownsville Safety Alliance. 
At least twice a year since 2020, nonprofit workers from the neighborhood spend a week calming disputes and responding to most 311 and 911 calls on certain blocks in the neighborhood. 
This year's April installment took on a special significance, because organizers' approach is similar to what Mayor Zohran Mamdani has vowed do across the city: have trained professionals respond to a range of 311 and 911 calls, and limit police intervention to the most serious cases. 
 This is what it looks like, having people actually willing to put skin in the game, give their time, give their energy to say, ‘I'm committed to keeping my community safe, and here's what I have to contribute to that vision,’” Deputy Mayor for Community Safety Renita Francois told Gothamist at the event in April. 
Guardians of safety 
Brownsville is the neighborhood with the largest concentration of public housing in the country, according to the city. 
The poverty rate in the neighborhood was 32% in 2023, according to a study by NYU. 
The number of homicides in the precinct that covers the neighborhood has fluctuated and is currently down 80% so far this year, compared to the same period two years ago. 
In 2024, the precinct recorded 21 homicides for the year, a much higher rate than other precincts in Brooklyn. 
In 2025, the precinct had seven. 
There has never been a shooting during a Brownsville Safety Alliance, organizers said. 
Organizers said sending civilians to respond to some public safety calls is just one part of how the Brownsville Safety Alliance keeps the neighborhood safe. 
Over the course of the week, various organizations set up foldable tables on Mother Gaston Boulevard and offer services to residents that range from fentanyl testing to help with setting up a bank account or signing up for an identification card. 
 IDs, a very essential thing,” said Dushoun Almond, an organizer known as “Bigga” who works with the nonprofit Brownsville In Violence Out. 
“The simplest thing is very serious.” 
Dana Rachlin, a co-founder of We Build The Block, said safety trainings offered to residents and nonprofit workers throughout the week can have a long-lasting impact on public safety in Brownsville. 
The trainings include things like how to administer naloxone and how to test drugs for fentanyl  to stop the bleed training and even how to safely handle a gun. 
Throughout the week, firearm instructor Bryon Ruck used a barbershop on the block as a classroom. 
He set up a foldable white table toward the back of the shop and instructed nonprofit workers and residents on how to safely handle and unload handguns using replica pistols. 
The goal of the firearm training is safety, Rachlin said. 
“We’ve had a ton of accidental discharges resulting in homicides. 
How can we not be responding urgently?” 
she said. 
“All of these things are harm reduction and helping community members be the guardians of their own safety and each other's safety.” 
A template 
Safety experts who spoke to Gothamist said they are encouraged by the event, but said scaling it up across the city could face red tape issues common in government. 
 It's an effective way of organizing neighborhoods and raising consciousness about public safety so that people start thinking about public safety as a community responsibility,” said Jeffrey Butts, a John Jay College professor who has studied the effect nonprofit groups have on public safety. 
But, he added, it would be an enormous task to create sustainable infrastructure to expand an event like this across the city and have it throughout the year. 
Liz Glazer, a public safety expert who previously worked in former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration, said expanding the model could be a heavy lift  but also said renewed focus on the approach presents an opportunity. 
“I think that is the major problem to be solved: ‘Do you have the organizational capacity in a neighborhood?’” 
Glazer said. 
“That's the challenge, but that also seems to me to be the opportunity because every neighborhood should have those kinds of organizations.” 
Rachlin said organizers are hopeful that the policies that guide the event each year  like sharing 911 and 311 calls with civilian responders in real time  can be applied throughout city government. 
“What we’re looking to scale are the policies and procedures of how we do this,” Rachlin said. 
“So that groups everywhere can be doing this because they already kind of are.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Ben Feuerherd: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Ben Feuerherd: 6.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 10.4%Ben Feuerherd: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Ben Feuerherd: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias1.6%This article: 10.4%Ben Feuerherd: 8.0%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.1%Ben Feuerherd: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.1%This article: 3.3%Ben Feuerherd: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 6.8%Ben Feuerherd: 11.0%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Ben Feuerherd: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Ben Feuerherd: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Ben Feuerherd: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.5%Ben Feuerherd: 5.6%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority24.5%This article: 8.5%Ben Feuerherd: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 5.3%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.3%This article: 11.4%Ben Feuerherd: 5.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.1%Ben Feuerherd: 6.3%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion10.1%This article: 2.6%Ben Feuerherd: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 9.9%Ben Feuerherd: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 5.2%Ben Feuerherd: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature5.2%This article: 4.8%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division4.8%This article: 7.2%Ben Feuerherd: 3.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal7.2%This article: 1.5%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.5%This article: 4.9%Ben Feuerherd: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%Ben Feuerherd: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.9%This article: 3.5%Ben Feuerherd: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 0.6%Ben Feuerherd: 2.0%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.6%This article: 5.2%Ben Feuerherd: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 11.9%Ben Feuerherd: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Feuerherd: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

852 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers43%attributed speech485writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBilal Jacks • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageRenita Francois • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageDushoun Almond • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Butts • 45 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey Butts • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLiz Glazer • 37 words • 0.0% coverageLiz Glazer • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLiz Glazer • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLiz Glazer • 22 words • 100.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDana Rachlin • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Renita Francois

100%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words15% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Renita Francois: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Renita Francois: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Renita Francois: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.