Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renita Francois results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Middle Ground, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 164.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,367 of 28,364 speakers). This Renita Francois is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Renita Francois
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.6%42.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos