Keyword summary
66%3 analyzed articles/videos940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brownsville results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 832 hits. Analysis detected 4,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,398 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,933 of 35,949 keywords). This Brownsville is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Brownsville
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Brownsville (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,398
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate