18-year-old man fatally shot steps from home in Brooklyn ⁠52%

By Roni Jacobson⁠63%

5/11/2026, 12:55:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 81.8% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 272 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,613 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the article peer group.

An 18-year-old man was gunned down just steps away from his home in Brooklyn on Sunday afternoon, cops said. 
Quahmir Cruz was shot in the chest on Blake Ave. near Mother Gaston Blvd. in Brownsville around 1 p.m., police said. 
Medics rushed Cruz to Brookdale University Hospital, where he died, authorities said. 
Police are investigating. 
So far there have been no arrests. 
Cruz lived in NYCHA's Van Dyke Houses, according to police, just steps from where he was shot. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 21.6%Roni Jacobson: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic21.6%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 64.8%Roni Jacobson: 3.5%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect64.8%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 72.7%Roni Jacobson: 10.4%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias72.7%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 4.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 23.9%Roni Jacobson: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias23.9%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.4%Roni Jacobson: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority3.4%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Roni Jacobson: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 7.4%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 5.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.3%Roni Jacobson: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.3%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 81.8%Roni Jacobson: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote81.8%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.2%Roni Jacobson: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice10.2%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Roni Jacobson: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

88 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.