Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Funding results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,675 hits. Analysis detected 13,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,171 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,117 of 16,562 topics). This Nonprofit Funding is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Nonprofit Funding
Topic details
Total words: 14,171
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos