Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Compliance results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 1,870 hits. Analysis detected 10,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,623 of 16,562 topics). This Nonprofit Compliance is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Nonprofit Compliance
Topic details
Total words: 5,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 30.2%30.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 35.2%35.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 35.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos