Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 2,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos