Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Ej Dickson results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Pessimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 949 hits . Analysis detected 6,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,731 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,606 authors). This Ej Dickson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ej Dickson
Author details
Total words: 6,731
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.1% 14.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst