Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Non Toxic Cookware results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 1,014 hits. Analysis detected 4,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (1,995 of 16,562 topics). This Non Toxic Cookware is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Non Toxic Cookware
Topic details
Total words: 1,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.0% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 58.0%58.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.0%16.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 58.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos