Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nolan Wells Case results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, In-Group Bias, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 2,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,806 of 16,559 topics). This Nolan Wells Case is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Nolan Wells Case
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 22.7%22.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.2%31.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos