Topic summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nobel Peace Prize results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,809 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,768 of 16,562 topics). This Nobel Peace Prize is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Nobel Peace Prize
Topic details
Total words: 1,809
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos