Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nike Boston Marathon Sign Backlash results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 1,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,122 of 16,562 topics). This Nike Boston Marathon Sign Backlash is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Nike Boston Marathon Sign Backlash
Topic details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos