Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nhs Waiting Lists results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 989 hits . Analysis detected 6,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,047 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Nhs Waiting Lists is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nhs Waiting Lists
Topic details
Total words: 7,047
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst