Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Policy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,777 of 16,562 topics). This Nfl Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Nfl Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos