OutKick97%

Roger Goodell And Art Rooney Say Rooney Rule Isn’t Going Anywhere Or Undergoing Changes 72%

By Armando Salguero0%

3/31/2026, 5:20:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Nature, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 520 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,204 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the article peer group.

PHOENIX  The lasting viability of the Rooney Rule was a question that hovered over the NFL when its annual meeting opened on Sunday, but by Tuesday evening when the meeting adjourned, both commissioner Roger Goodell and Art Rooney, a namesake for the rule, delivered an answer. 
The Rooney Rule isn't going anywhere, both men said. 
"No," Goodell said emphatically when asked if the rule would go away anytime soon. 
"The Rooney Rule has been around a long time. 
We've evolved it, we've changed it. 
We'll continue to do that as circumstances warrant." 
Would Florida AG Force Changes? 
Circumstances could warrant action, at least in Florida, where Attorney General James Uthmeier sent Roger Goodell a letter putting the NFL on notice that he believes "the Rooney Rule and its offshoots are illegal in Florida." 
Uthmeier explained in his letter why he believes this is so, and asked the league to inform him that the Rooney Rule would no longer be enforced on Florida's three NFL teams  the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins and Jacksonville Jaguars. 
The league is obviously taking this seriously. 
It was a subject of discussion among owners, according to Rooney himself. 
But the NFL doesn't seem to be headed toward any changes  at least not without there being a legal battle. 
Art Rooney: No Change To Rule 
"I don't anticipate any dramatic changes to the Rooney Rule," Rooney said Wednesday. 
"We always are looking at our employment policies, and every year we do an analysis of what we're doing, what we can do to improve the situation, but I don't expect any major changes to the Rooney Rule." 
"We had a little discussion about the Rooney Rule. 
There were some questions about it. 
There was no action taken, just a statement from the Florida Attorney General. 
So, probably have some conversations with the Attorney General down there just to make sure he understands what exactly we do. 
It's not a hiring rule. 
So, I think we're comfortable with where we are." 
"I think everybody's in favor of the Rooney Rule. 
There's no discussion about getting rid of it, that's for sure." 
The ball seems to be in Uthmeier's court now. 
The NFL, a league whose game measures the taking and ceding of ground, is dug in. 
NFL Will Engage With AG 
"One thing that doesn't change is our values," Goodell said. 
"We believe that diversity has been a benefit to the National Football League. 
We are well aware of the laws and where the laws are changing or evolving. 
We think the Rooney Rule is consistent with those, and we certainly will engage with the Florida AG or anybody else as we have in the past to talk about our policies and what they are." 
"As you know, the Rooney Rule is not a hiring mandate. 
It is used by industries beyond football and far beyond the United States to help identify candidates and diverse candidates to bring in better talent to give us an opportunity to hire the best talent." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.4%Armando Salguero: 5.3%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias15.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Armando Salguero: 4.7%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic2.7%This article: 6.7%Armando Salguero: 1.7%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 19.4%Armando Salguero: 4.5%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias19.4%This article: 6.5%Armando Salguero: 10.5%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.6%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Armando Salguero: 1.5%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Armando Salguero: 3.5%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 4.0%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 3.1%Armando Salguero: 14.7%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias3.1%This article: 9.0%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 5.4%Armando Salguero: 2.9%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error5.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 3.3%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.1%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Armando Salguero: 2.2%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.0%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 9.0%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.7%Armando Salguero: 3.3%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority18.7%This article: 6.7%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%Armando Salguero: 10.6%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.7%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 6.2%Armando Salguero: 6.0%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 7.3%Armando Salguero: 1.6%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question7.3%This article: 2.5%Armando Salguero: 1.8%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.1%Armando Salguero: 0.7%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof8.1%This article: 10.4%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature10.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.3%Armando Salguero: 3.1%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 1.7%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman1.7%This article: 5.8%Armando Salguero: 2.1%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground1.2%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.0%Armando Salguero: 0.3%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading4.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%Armando Salguero: 2.1%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 2.7%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 5.0%Armando Salguero: 14.8%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 2.7%Armando Salguero: 1.7%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.3%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.4%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.2%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

520 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers66%attributed speech175writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 14 words • 100.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageJames Uthmeier • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageArt Rooney • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 13 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 38 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 6 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 13 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 21 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 5 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArt Rooney • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 35 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roger Goodell

100%flagged-word coverage
157 attributed words46% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote-20.6 ptsWriter: 20.6%Roger Goodell: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.9 ptsWriter: 14.9%Roger Goodell: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+8.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Roger Goodell: 8.9%8.9%Indoctrination+8.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Roger Goodell: 8.9%8.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.