Topic summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diversity Initiatives results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,025 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,536 of 16,562 topics). This Diversity Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Diversity Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 3,025
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos