Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video1,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Newspaper Archiving results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,238 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,800 of 16,562 topics). This Newspaper Archiving is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Newspaper Archiving
Topic details
Total words: 5,238
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos