Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Newfoundland And Labrador results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Newfoundland And Labrador is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Newfoundland And Labrador
Topic details
Total words: 1,575
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos