Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York State Policy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This New York State Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New York State Policy
Topic details
Total words: 3,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos