Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Housing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,021 of 16,562 topics). This New York City Housing is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
New York City Housing
Topic details
Total words: 1,827
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.0%12.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.9%15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Special Pleading: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos