Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Government results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 851 hits. Analysis detected 6,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,192 of 16,562 topics). This New York City Government is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
New York City Government
Topic details
Total words: 5,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos