Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Restaurants results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 3,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,779 of 16,562 topics). This New Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
New Restaurants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 29.6%29.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos