Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Mexico results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 2,805 hits. Analysis detected 13,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,085 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,339 of 15,565 topics). This New Mexico is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
New Mexico
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,085
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate