Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Deal Programs results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (15,538 of 21,294 topics). This New Deal Programs is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
New Deal Programs
Topic details
Total words: 2,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos