Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neurotechnology results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,645 of 16,562 topics). This Neurotechnology is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Neurotechnology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos