Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netflix Shows results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,003 of 16,562 topics). This Netflix Shows is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Netflix Shows
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos