Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netanyahu's Legal Challenges results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 3,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,469 of 15,788 topics). This Netanyahu's Legal Challenges is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Netanyahu's Legal Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 4,827
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos