Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neofascism results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,681 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,891 of 15,930 topics). This Neofascism is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Neofascism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,681
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos