Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Gorsuch results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,789 hits. Analysis detected 11,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,682 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,411 of 16,562 topics). This Neil Gorsuch is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Neil Gorsuch
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,682
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate