Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Restaurants results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Bandwagon, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 2,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,145 of 16,562 topics). This Neighborhood Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Neighborhood Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 3,230
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos