Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Policy results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anchoring Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,138 of 16,562 topics). This Neighborhood Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Neighborhood Policy
Topic details
Total words: 308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.1% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles308 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos